Caty McNally vs Mccartney Kessler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 09:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. McNally vs M. Kessler

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: McNally 0 - 1 Kessler
They have played 2 sets in total, with Caty McNally winning 0 and Mccartney Kessler winning 2. The last match between Mccartney Kessler and Caty McNally was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 10-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mccartney Kessler getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McNally | 0 |
| Kessler | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-10-25)
C. McNally vs M. Kessler H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,334,271 | Career Prize Money | $959,111 |
| 60.24% (197-130) | Career Total W/L | 64.26% (169-94) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 7 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 47.62% (10-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.41% (31-23) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
C. McNally vs M. Kessler Match Preview:
- Kessler has a significant advantage in second serve performance, winning 41.72% of points, compared to Mc Nally's 34.44% over the past 6 months. How crucial is this? It could directly influence the match's outcome.
- For return games, both players are close, with Mc Nally winning 50.67% and Kessler marginally ahead at 50.78% for opponent's second serves. This similarity could lead to tie situations.
- Mc Nally is slightly more efficient in returning first serves, having a 35.24% success rate against Kessler's 32.68%. Will Mc Nally leverage this slight edge effectively?
- Kessler excels under pressure, saving 53.55% of breakpoints compared to Mc Nally's 39.2%, which might indicate Kessler's poise in crucial moments.
- Comparing recent performances, Kessler has won 62.5% of matches over the last year, whereas Mc Nally hasn't secured a win (0%). Does this dictate who has the upper hand?
- When facing stronger competition, Kessler has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.8, but details on Mc Nally's opponents are missing, potentially indicating lesser experience with high-ranked players.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kessler shows strong resilience, having a 63% success rate, while Mc Nally has not won in similar situations over the past year.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Mc Nally seems slightly more successful, converting 43.06% of chances, compared to Kessler's 38.38%, which can be important for momentum shifts during the match.
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing matchup of skill and current form between Mc Nally and Kessler.
While Mc Nally exhibits a robust ability to convert break points, their overall match-winning prospects appear limited by previous performance trends and second serve efficacy.
Kessler, boasting consistent match wins over the past year, shows superior prowess under pressure and a notable advantage in deciding sets, making them a formidable contender.
Based on these assessments, Kessler is the likely winner in this upcoming encounter, leveraging their superior recent form and capability to thrive in high-stakes scenarios.
Caty McNally vs Mccartney Kessler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. McNally vs M. Kessler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:31:19 | Average Match Time | 1:31:19 |
| 65% (44/68) | 1st Serve % | 54% (33/61) |
| 55% (24/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 25% (2/8) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 39% (24/61) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/68) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. McNally Recent Matches Played
M. Kessler Recent Matches Played

C. McNally vs M. Kessler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.24% (197/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.26% (169/94) |
| 58.40% (438/312) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.00% (366/244) |
| 53.72% (3649/3143) | Games Win/Loss | 54.31% (3113/2619) |
| 55.19% (85/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.48% (117/59) |
| 58.97% (46/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (25/25) |
| 71.15% (37/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 77.27% (17/5) |
| 67.44% (29/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (10/5) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 601 | Aces Total | 377 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1315 | Total Double Faults | 788 |
| 1:32:18 | Average Match Time | 1:29:30 |
| 332.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.24 |
| 65% (13438/20584) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10100/16294) |
| 63% (8464/13438) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6262/10100) |
| 44% (3165/7146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2799/6193) |
| 50% (1311/2624) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1029/2098) |
| 46% (9673/20831) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7532/16130) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Slam W/L | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Masters W/L | 44.00% (11/14) |
| 52.75% (48/43) | Main Tour W/L | 69.23% (36/16) |
| 70.34% (102/43) | Challenger W/L | 65.97% (95/49) |
| 69.57% (16/7) | Futures W/L | 76.92% (20/6) |
| 60% (194/322) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (167/259) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (28/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (33/67) |
| 53% (54/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (57/86) |
| 85% (202/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (142/128) |
| 15% (202/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (142/14) |
| 20% (125/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (121/40) |